Open
Conversation
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to e7735bb in 1 minute and 21 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
17lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. src/importers.rst:11
- Draft comment:
Good update – wrapping 'Lifecycle' in backticks for a reST reference improves consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. src/importers.rst:12
- Draft comment:
New Foqos importer entry added; verify that wording (e.g. 'screentime' capitalization) is consistent with similar entries. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
3. src/importers.rst:12
- Draft comment:
Typo/consistency: Consider using a consistent capitalization for 'Screen Time'. In line 8 it's 'Screen Time' but here it's 'screentime'. For clarity and consistency, it might be better to use 'Screen Time breaks' if that is the intended reference. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% This is a minor stylistic issue about capitalization in documentation. The meaning is clear either way. The rules specifically say not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant. They also say not to comment on pure UI/styling changes. While this is documentation not UI, the same principle applies - we should trust the author's styling choices unless they cause real problems. The inconsistency could potentially confuse readers about whether these are referring to the same concept. Documentation clarity is important for user experience. While clarity is important, this capitalization difference is extremely minor and doesn't impact understanding. "Screen Time" vs "screentime" is a commonly understood term either way. This comment should be deleted as it's too minor and purely stylistic, violating our rules about not making unimportant comments.
Workflow ID: wflow_qtrOtIKGCwszfUgH
You can customize 
Contributor
Author
|
Force pushed to change feat to docs for commit |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Important
Add
aw-importer-foqostoimporters.rstfor Foqos app screentime break imports.aw-importer-foqostoimporters.rstfor importing screentime breaks from the Foqos app.Foqosinimporters.rst.This description was created by
for e7735bb. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.